The Merits of “Home” Wild Cards
The tennis world was first introduced to Olivia Rogowska when she pushed then-World No. 1 Dinara Safina to the limit in the first round at the 2009 US Open. An 18-year old, Rogowska played with the reckless abandon one would expect from a teenager in her first professional season. Safina recovered from an 0-3, 15-40 deficit in the third set and escaped with a 6-7 (5), 6-2, 6-4 win.
At the 2009 US Open, Rogowska was a wild card – a position she has since become quite familiar with in her five professional seasons. However, with a career-high ranking of No. 111, current ranking of No. 172 and career earnings of just $486,920, she’s received little career benefit from those handouts. With a 6-3, 7-5 loss to Kimiko Date-Krumm in the first round of the Brisbane International this afternoon, Rogowska’s WTA record as a wild card in Australia falls to 1-12.
2014: R1 – l. to Kimiko Date-Krumm 6-3, 7-5
2013: R1 – l. to (Q) Monica Puig 6-2, 6-3
2012: R1 – l. to Barbora Zahlavova Strycova 6-2, 4-6, 6-4
2011: R1 – l. to (Q) Tamira Paszek 6-1, 6-3
2010: R1 – l. to (2) Shahar Peer 6-3, 6-2
2009: R1 – l. to Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 6-3, 6-1
2013: R1 – l to Maria Kirilenko 7-5, 6-2
2013: R1 – l. to (Q) Vesna Dolonc 5-7, 7-5, 8-6
2012: R1 – d. Sofia Arvidsson 6-3, 6-1 | R2 – l. to (5) Li Na 6-2, 6-2
2011: R1 – l. to Evgeniya Rodina 6-3, 6-1
2010: R1 – l. to Sorana Cirstea 6-3, 2-6, 6-2
2009: R1 – l. to (31) Alona Bondarenko 5-7, 6-3, 6-2
In addition, Rogowska has received the reciprocal Australian wild card at the other three slams three times. As a wild card at Roland Garros and the US Open, she has recorded an overall record of 1-3.
While this is not necessarily an indictment on Rogowska herself, her situation represents one that has become all too common. Players from the four Grand Slam nations have long been the beneficiary of nearly-unlimited wild cards when the opportunity arises, regardless of deciding factors including age, ability level and recent results. Rogowska played out of her skin for a set and a half against a crumbling Safina nearly five years ago, and has ridden that result (of a match she lost) even since. Often, she’s continually placed in draws where she’s out of her depth and has failed more often than she has succeeded. As a result, she’s achieved little momentum in her professional career.
One Australian player who didn’t receive a main draw wild card into the Brisbane International is Ashleigh Barty. She received a wild card to the qualifying draw instead. Barty, the 17-year old wunderkind who reached three Grand Slam doubles finals last year with Casey Dellacqua, has struggled to make inroads in singles on the women’s tour. After battling past Cagla Buyukakcay 7-5, 6-7(4), 6-3 in the opening round, she defeated sixth-seeded Julia Glushko 6-3, 6-2 to move into the final round of qualifying. In the final round, Barty saved five match points in defeating Kiki Bertens, 2-6, 6-3, 7-5.
Two fairly young players (Barty, 17 & Rogowska, 22), two different situations. Even if Barty also loses her first match in the main draw, she would leave Brisbane with a lot more confidence and momentum than Rogowska.
With this not a unique situation, it becomes a question of whether or not the wild card system itself is flawed. Does a concept meant to give players an opportunity that they might not get otherwise end up doing more harm than good?
Reblogged this on Tennis Abides.
Interesting article. I have recently wondered the same thing about Olivia.
Here in the UK we have the poster boy for wild card futilty namely Alex Bogdanovic. he got eight WCs in a row for Wimbledon(2002-09) but never won a match. In 2010 the LTA finally stopped giving him a WC but he hasn’t qualified for Wimbledon since. He qualified for one GS in his life – the 2004 US Open. I think we made life too easy for him.